About Me

Name: Jay Kern
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
[Click to edit me]

Local Government and the State Assembly

    As most people are aware, the state legislature here in PA operates the same way as the federal government.  The legislature makes and passes bills, and the governor signs them into law.  However, the role of state legislatures goes well beyond that scope.

    One of the most important aspects of individual legislators is their ability to interact with local municipalities.  While many broad policies originate at the state level, in the end it is the county and local governments that end up dealing with most issues.  Roads, water/sewer, garbage removal, even electric production for some; all of these are regulated in some sense by the state, but local government is the first entity put to the grind stone when residents are dissatisfied.   

    It is also important for legislators to be aware of what their individual constituents are interested in having done.  However, local issues are best taken care of by local officials with assistance from the state.  Not by a state law that ignores that level of government that is best suited to deal with those issues.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guns & Hunting

    I am a strong supporter of hunters and trappers in the state of Pennsylvania.  I do not hunt myself, but there's nothing better than fresh deer bologna in my opinion.  I will attempt to address some of the concerns that have been brought to my attention from speaking with constituents.

    First, I am in favor of hunting seasons for all wild game animals if there is a viable population to support such activities.  At the same time I am not advocating the hunting of endangered or protected species, although I'm not entirely sold on exacly how some of those animals end up on those lists.  The Pennsylvania Legislature should stay out of the business of regulating hunting seasons and harvests except on the broadest of terms. (Such as where state income from these programs should be spent.)  The state of Pennsylvania has a gaming commission to oversee most everyday issues.

   Second, I support a zero net land use law.  This in effect guarantees the acreage of state land available to hunt.  For example, if the state determines that 40 acres in Lebanon County is deemed 'unfit' to hunt, that 40 acres must be guaranteed somewhere else in the state.  For the record, I would not support a reduced acreage of State lands in  Lebanon County, this is merely an example.
 
  Third, I strongly support gun handling safety courses to be OFFERED IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS here in Pennsylvania.  I acknowledge that guns can be deemed 'unsafe' in the hands of the ignorant, however with the proper training guns are a safe and effective tool for protecting and defending yourself and one's property and life.

    I am also a gun owner, a member of the National Rifle Association, and I strongly support the right to own, the right to carry, and the right to use a gun to defend yourself.  This is one right guaranteed to every citizen by the United States Constitution (and SPECIFICALLY by the Pennsylvania Constituition) which I feel is non-negotiable.  Further gun controls beyond those already in place (and some that ARE in place) here in Pennsylvania do nothing but give politicians a photo op and the opportunity to grand stand for certain special interests.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Environment

    While I am a lover of the outdoors, I do feel that there needs to be a compromise between conserving and protecting our environment and the monetary cost of doing so. 

    The Chesapeake Bay may be a 'national treasure', but bankrupting municipalities, businesses, farmers, and individual tax payers in central Pennsylvania is NOT the proper way to go about it.  Particularly when such actions have not been satisfactorily shown to appreciably improve the quality of the Bay.

    The Chesapeake Bay Agreement of 2000 (or maybe 2001) is merely the most expensive and most publicized of such projects to date.  Such squandering of money has been going on for years. 

    The goal of many individuals is to ultimately own their own home.  It is economically irresponsible to force homeowners to pay as much as $35,000 to catch and reconstitute the rainwater from their property.  When one works hard and pays good money to purchase property, hire a builder, and create their dream, that extra expense comes as a pretty big surprise.  Especially as that is money that gets paid up front.

    If this trend continues, farmers (particularly dairy farmers) won't be safe either.  At this point in time the conservation district assists farmers to install fencing and stream crossings as well as other improvements.  With budgets getting tight that money will be drying up while the regulations continue to grow stricter.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »